Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives from the police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the uncovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this element for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of your boy or Woman do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that is a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Summaries offer an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and insurance policies aimed toward safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments here from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could be one or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason for the decision of your majority can represent a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.